the Forgotten Agenda, Housing of Self Catering Slaves

Stop Evictions and Reinstate Land Rights for all Subjects, and make the Issue of Housing a Number One Priority to enable the Emancipation of the British. 

the past   

evictions has nothing changed

now

Nope little has changed except the hats

and the shame 

just shameful, we should fight a war to keep her in her bungalow,  oh yeah we did ,  them Nazis would of thrown her out put a official or toady in there, looks like her husband wasted his time. because some home grown Fascist  came and evicted her anyway.

Ida Hall, 89, whose husband was a prisoner of war, said: 'I didn't want to leave. I liked my little bungalow.'
source ... http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/3627999/Probe-over-council-official-who-evicted-pensioners-then-moved-into-their-home.html

40,000 families were evicted from their homes in 2011, figures for 2012 are not available but "the Guardian reports In the 12 months to September 2012, 198,470 households in England were threatened with repossession or eviction".
source... http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2012/dec/14/london-household-highest-eviction-risk

Is it time to help those being evicted make a stand, make it expensive to throw a family out on the street or when voting comes around tell them straight, first things first, sort out housing for everybody to a standard a 

politician

would accept without the debt or at least long term debt, make them make it an issue, no 1 first step, Basic needs first. We are all divided but face this common problem or struggle, its needs to be I think a rally point a single issue that should unites nearly everybody, and even those that are sitting pretty or luck enough should still benefit from this problem being sorted. I hope if you can bear with me and read on I can make this clearer. YOUR COUNTRY NEEDS YOU, YOUR COUNTRY NEEDS ROADS, YOUR COUNTRY NEED SOLDIERS YOUR COUNTRY NEEDS you get the idea

YOUR COUNTRY NEEDS YOU, YOU NEED A HOUSE, IF IT WAS YOUR COUNTRY WOULDN'T YOU HAVE A HOUSE,
chances are a landlord* or the Bank own Your Home, how many people are telling themselves its only right to leave this basic need to capital, its not important, to put this wrong right, instead we need more jobs so we can pay for a roof over our families heads, we need higher wages to pay for our homes, we need better education so we can get a job to pay for a home, Why not sort out suitable housing plan, with no or little debt, the benefits and improvements in life will pay dividends and the economy would be boosted, it woulds cost little to have interest free loans for first time home buyers, and some sort of subsidy plan, introduce a homesteading act to repopulate the countryside with low impact housing, which will take the strain off the towns and breath life in to the countryside.

" its not the fault of the Aristocracy to profit from something that happened in the past" In Other Words ... dammed peasants did lose so they should pay still, is it not all about OUR heritage, a Englishman's home is his Castle, what is the point of a castle if there wasn't any Peasants, I think your find its enshrined for all time only "freemen" in the MAGNA CARTA, , if they were freemen they would have Land Rights,(they don't they lost remember), that would be silly because they are Peasants. we have a chuckle down at the Club, wot a jape silly serf hasn't a clue." 

*landlord this word is accepted or so it seems to me accepted without condition, its wrong we have accepted this word as its enforcing the notion your a peasant and subconsciously confirmed by renting off a LandLord. Its symbolism of course a landlord might just be a ordinary bloke doing his best to run a business supplying a product, even doing a service, however he is taking advantage of a condition forced upon us and when or while there is housing problem, homeless, badly housed and struggle its not right, . Lords own the land, and the Title has become a little blurred, but the aristocracy can be titled or not, its Lord is as Lord does, there is a lot of denial and double think about but a Lord is nothing more than a Gang Leader.

There shouldn't be a housing problem, its a basic need that has to be sorted out by the country(UK), it is evidence if not proof this isn't your country, England is occupied by another class based on a conquest 947 years ago, much the same for Wales and Scotland and Ireland a few less years , moving across  half the world including the USA spreading its Web.

I think its very important I know most people don't agree, but..

I am not talking about more council housing or social housing, I mean decent housing, and a way found to make it easy without a high cost or lifetime debt, its a basic need. What is the point of being a country or having the vote if this can't be sorted out, everybody is running around up their arses to get or keep a roof over their heads, it has its impact I think on nearly all of society ills. Just imagine if peoples wages didn't have to pay out such a large chunk, Shell out for all their lives in most cases, without this debt or it shortened they would have money to spend in the economy, instead of it gushing up, to those that are the inheritors of a unfair past involving conquest, slavery, dispossession, land clearances, war and exploitation.
with this injustice gone and more money to spend there would be more jobs, both parents wouldn't have to work or full time, so more jobs, less worry healthier people. more ability to make good environmental decisions.

needed is something like an interest free loan for first time home buyers,

a subsidy to bring some payment back for the hundreds of years of displacement and dispossession and land clearances,

a homesteading act to repopulate the countryside with low impact housing,

I know people say the country doesn't owe you anything, that's crap that's why you form a country, you work for it, it helps you and coordinates basics, law, roads, taxes, health, and you can't just have a mad land grab so housing also need to be co ordinated to a standard a politition would accept, it has to be proper decent, its not our fault there was a conquest and they shouldn't prosper from it while we have to suffer it.

we can't have democracy if we have a system where the market depends on a conquest and land grab of the few hundreds of years ago, who would go along with that only people in denial.

Our system grew from slavery of its own people, then it was catapulted to international richness from more slavery, and we allow these people to set the rules and standards, you can't tell me people are thinking right.

why is it not on everybody's mind when election time comes around and why people don't say back to politicians "yeah yeah heard it all before, if you want my vote sort out this basic need and this missing step in democracy. Proper housing for everybody without a lifetime debt, and when you agree, we can decide how that's achieved, but I don't want anything less that you would accept" all the rest can come when we are emancipated.

if we want control of our lives, this is a basic step that we need to get it and why we don't have it.
Add on top of that millions of people live on massive housing estates and who thinks it is really wrong. This shameful affair is a daily injustice that most people handle by denial whether they live on one or are lucky enough not to have to,and its a shameful indictment on all of us.

Medieval Wood Cut depicting Serfdom,
Its a good job its just a coincidence the Rich get richer with an abundance of Poor or because your Ancestors lost their Land Rights and say in matters when they became Slaves, Good job its in the past because if we didn't have land rights, and we were laden with debt because the land had been taken and the government didn't sort out a way to bring some reasonable equality of this basic need, a home for all, like Roads, a House is even more important and something decent shouldn't be a struggle, unless you still are a serf, that is a modern self catering serf.

Here in England the Normans took the Saxons from their homesteads and put them in villages, which were slave quarters, they are now sort after places to live, now we have housing estates and excuses why we have to have them and people are lucky to have and should be grateful and keep them tidy.

we can’t  fight this system with force, this  system whose very being is occupying you and this island. It is class ridden and very tricky too, and what ever you are likely to do is probably going to go wrong, there is a rule in this country, its denied but even their history is full examples of it and its still denied, its part of the forgotten agenda its a policy of "submit or be Squashed"
I see a peaceful way and anything that isn't peaceful or in a peaceful manner you're walking into a trap, "only lead by example, don't follow someone unless they are going the same way as you”.

I would focus on all our attention to this subject because its what we nearly all are missing, and there are a lot of people who are struggling to get a roof over their heads or keep one, most of the country could be behind this if it is understood.

Its a basic step and before we can grow up or be emancipated we need it sorted, but denial is rife, its so rife people are in denial that denial is rife,

where's your basic right to live on a bit of land in your own country, we all know it was stolen or and has the state sorted it out to a decent standard no! instead they leave it in the hands of the people that have inherited it from the past conquest,

you don't have any right because its not your country unless you acknowledge its been stolen, does that not make sense or is it jus me with a long memory;

time to grow up. LETS NOT MAKE THIS THE FUTURE

Men in suits Evict the Peasants so the Games can Begin, one is getting awfully angry why are the Peasants not Revolting,  Do you need more Guns,  Philip shoot that peasant lets get this started,

Shame on the UK

Our Heritage of Shame 

Head of the Gang

The Royal Family, a Heritage of Shame, its hereditary class system steeped in war, Its business War, slavery, extortion, it stands for inequality, it stand for justice but how can there be inequality and justice. Its legacy on this nation is dispossession and its heritage is slavery and war. And its Shameful that we put up with it, let alone embrace it as many of the population do, including all the Military.

In the year 2012 the UK celebrated The Queen’s Diamond Jubilee, SHAMEFUL and SHAME on the UK to rejoice in this despots gang leaders rule, are we mad stupid or is it right to Follow Gang Rule.

She stands for a system of High Gang Lords. Lords of the Land,  Kings,Queens, princes, Dukes, Earls, and Barons, the Landed Gentry, Lords who are also Bankers, heads and backers of big corporations, All top jobs in the Civil Service, Home Office, Secret Services, the Military. Old Boy's from Public Schools  who between them run this country, which is making democracy a sham. Of course there are other rich people not really in the club and lords who have fallen, who can be used to blur the perception.

SHAME, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME on us ALL.  

notice from this hand bill of 1792 the french have equality nestsaled between Murder and Madness

with this class system  we cannot have Equality it goes against all a Lord is.

Democracy

Democracy

House of  Commons , No this the house of Charlatans 

Democracy; is this really a democracy, where is the representation when many ministers are either public schoolboys and millionaires, those that are not of this class are soon bought or nobbled, then these scum vote in a leader and more or less half of these so called representatives are then fairly powerless in the party system. but because the Ol'boy network runs every area of government, the foreign office, the home office, the monetary system, the military, the police, the whole civil service and armed forces are all at the top public school boys and members of secret societies. 

Above,Burlington Club photo

(1) the Hon. Edward Sebastian Grigg, the heir to Baron Altrincham of Tormarton and current chairman of Credit Suisse (UK)

(2) David Cameron

(3) Ralph Perry Robinson, a former child actor, designer, furniture-maker

(4) Ewen Fergusson, son of the British ambassador to France, Sir Ewen Fergusson and now at City law firm Herbert Smith

(5) Matthew Benson, the heir to the Earldom of Wemyss and March

(6) Sebastian James, the son of Lord Northbourne, a major landowner in Kent

(7) Jonathan Ford, the-then president of the club, a banker with Morgan Grenfell

(8) Boris Johnson, the-then president of the Oxford Union, now Lord Mayor of London

(9) Harry Eastwood, the investment fund consultant

In the this Burlington club photo taken in 1992, there are eight famous faces:

(1) George Osborne, now the Chancellor of the Exchequer and Second Lord of the Treasury of the United Kingdom,

(2) writer Harry Mount, the heir to the Baronetcy of Wasing and Mr. Cameron’s cousin;

(3) Chris Coleridge, the descendant of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, the son of Lloyds’ chairman David Coleridge, the brother of Conde Nast managing director Nicholas Coleridge(4) German aristocrat and managing consultant Baron Lupus von Maltzahn,(5) the late Mark Petre, the heir to the Barony of Petre;(6) Australian millionaire Peter Holmes a Cour;(7) Nat Rothschild, the heir to the Barons Rothschilds and co-founder of a racy student paper with Harry Mount(8) Jason Gissing, the chairman of Ocado supermarkets.Two figures on left of (6) and (7) were blacked out before the photo was released, causing wild allegations. Their identities are yet unknown. My top contenders (based on the influence in the City, the Athenaeum and their Oxford prominence) include: 

source for the above two photos and information, iconicphotos.wordpress.com.the-bullingdon-club

The System that Rules.

The Queen is not only a State Figurehead She is also the Head of a Hereditary system of Lords a undeniable upper class system. and I think believing it is just show is making a grave mistake.
The way this Gang works is the same as any other and the  Leader who in this case the Queen but this also applies to all leaders; "No Leader is all Powerful, they are only as powerful as the powerful people who align and support them"Magna Carta and Our so called Civil War" should attest to that.
The Queens Powers apart from influence that comes with wealth and celebraty and her wealth and influence as I will show is Great, She is the only person to declare war and peace (official website for the British Monarchy) sounds pretty powerful to me. you might say that's just part of her head of state duties, shes being told, but who is telling her, not  the PM he might have a view but War is the Buiseness of England, England the UK and the Empire built on it, Our Wealth comes from wars, Wars are the Oldest big Business and the business of Kings Its a popular view that the Queen and Lords have no power now,  a view I do not subscribe too. Does anyone think the prime minister and his ministers really get to decide if we go to War if all the lords, Bankers, Arms Dealers and wealthy people beyond compare, the royal family, didn't want War, all these people back the Queen and she can say no, she is commander in chief, the archdukes virtually have private armies at their call they certainly don't answer to the PM and by Law not in the Matters of War, the Lords are in control of the armies of well trained troops ready to lay down their lives for their General and Queen and they don't go "yes sir ok PM", if they didn't want too, and truth be told some upper class gun runner and chums probably on both sides maneuvered the situation into crises and War. 

The Queens Powers Outlined below you can find on the official website for the British Monarchy. 

The Queen, Head of the Family, Head Family of the Oldest Gang Network in the UK, conquest and war, enslavement extortion and tax invasion, murder and mayhem incorporated. 

“The Queen is the ceremonial head of state” this is true, She is also the figurehead for a system of Lords and where her main power lies.“

Powers of the Queen

The monarch can summon, prorogation and or dissolution of Parliament; she may not have used it but this is a phenomenal power, there is also the Royal assent to bills, she can withhold it;

The appointment and regulation of the civil service. This another very powerful position;

The commissioning of officers in the armed forces, very powerful position, 

The monarch is the commander in chief, and dukes are major generals, most all officers except some low ones are filled with members of her class, this is very powerful and as long as we or parliament go along with the rulers there is no need to exercise it, push come to shove who are the Military officers whose friends and family are making the rules running the Government and the Corporations going to follow, some lefty Government or the Queen, people will willing die for her.

after the so called civil war, which was a power struggle, between aristos, the rule became spread out from the Monarchs Court, giving more power to Parliament who were Aristocracy titled or not, there was no voting for common people, with wealth and land you could vote, you might even get a title bestowed on you if you are the right sort, after the civil war once the new order was established, according to parliamentary records, a permanent army was to be maintained to stop any further civil insurrection, and the military given back to the control of Lords and the Monarch reinstated.

I repeat; one thing I hold and that is that no leader, king, dictator in history is all powerful, they are only as powerful as the powerful people that align with them. true power is wielded from behind the throne that is what magna carta and the civil war were about but that also makes the ruler powerful this is gang law.

Directing the disposition of the armed forces in the UK; as I said she is commander in chief.

the Appointment of Queen's Counsel; another very influential position.

Issue and withdrawal of passports; her country you're a subject.

Prerogative of mercy. (Used to apply in capital punishment cases. Still used, eg to remedy errors in sentence calculation) the queen signs warrants for execution in the commonwealth, shes not one for pardoning so I here.

Granting honours; some people will do anything to get on there, more power and influence

Creation of corporations by Charter; power and influence,

The Queen gives a weekly audience to the Prime Minister at which she has a right and a duty to express her views on Government matters. If either The Queen or the Prime Minister are not available to meet, then they will speak by telephone. also the princes have to be kept abreast of all secrets, in case they have to take over for some reason, Most PMs are going to be in awe of the monarch or of her class, if she tells them to do something, if she has the backing of those that she is head off, what choice would they have, her friends who back her are heads of the secret services, the Ol’bot network is in all top jobs.

the Queen being forbidden to enter the commons. This is ceremonial, its a show, nothing more,

the Queen has a say on  The making of treaties; Declaration of war; Deployment of armed forces overseas; Recognition of foreign states; Accreditation and reception of diplomats. This is much power and influence

The queen is head of state for the United Kingdom of Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Jamaica, Barbados, the Bahamas, Grenada, Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Belize, Antigua and Barbuda, and Saint Kitts and Nevis. Getting the picture yet?

She has a lot of wealth power and influence in her own right but the argument that she is a figurehead of state wouldn't be so bad if she wasn't also a figurehead for a hereditary class system that is in every position of power, that is the main problem.

It doesn't matter whether the blood lines are pure or if the aristocracy has titles as long as the class system is maintained, it can blur around the edges, that helps maintain the fallacy or denial that its not really a barrier.

Rothschild got his lordship in the 17th century for his support in banking and supplying loans for War or dastardly deeds more like, his family had been loaning kings money for wars and conquest and the other side for that matter for centuries, Plutocracy or Aristocracy there is little difference they are both rule by the elite or wealthy, same difference, you don’t need to be titled to be a member of the aristocracy.

Democracy;

democracy if it is such a good thing why do we have a leader and not a chairperson, instead we have a unelected Leader not elected by the people and why do the people want a Prime Minister to be a strong leader, if democracy is such a good thing surely a chairman presiding over the elected would be better. What we have is an exercise in denial and double thinking.

Democracy;

Democracy where every four years we get a chance to vote in MP's who time after time turn out to be less than savory, cheats liars, scroungers  they took advantage with expensive's which they had been doing with the public purse for centuries, and these so called representative's vote in another temporary dictator, more often than not a chap, a chum, member of the club, the right sort and nothing much changes except more laws to restrict us and the rich get richer.

For  the Rich to get richer there must be an abundance of poor and denial

And never does the housing problem get sorted, the housing problem is a legacy left over from the 1066 conquest and it is left to those that are and have benefited from this past injustice and it is never on the agenda except to keep us dispossessed unless we have capital and a lot of it, in fact we are so dumbed down we don't as a nation think it is wrong, I really cant understand this even with all the programming, division and conditioning  and to compound it people have to get massive loans from banks who are some of the most unscrupulous businesses's  and whose business over the centuries made their money from enslaving this and other nations and bankrolling wars.


How can you have a democracy when most of our country(the land) is owned by the aristocracy, democracy can not with any justice co-exist with a class system whose  legacy and Heritage is the 1066 invasion, who voted them in, no one they are there by force.

Our Ancestors, Our Land or Not.

Our Ancestors, Our Land or Not.

We all have ancestors and they go back to the dawn of life on the Planet, unless we were brought here from outta space and it makes no difference if your ancestors came here after the ice age or the Romans, If this is our country why do we not have the right to live on the land why if this is our country would we not have the right but there are descendants of the Norman conquest and members of their class and still hold large areas of land and have expanded their influence, as their Empire Grew.  
Do we still have system of Lords actually running the country, I would say so. They are in all the top jobs in government and civil service, military, law and banking.
We have been a country for over a 1,000 years and we have the so called Mother of Parliaments, Laws. its insurmountable, imagine everybody or every family had a home a decent place to live without debt, impossible,not the shit holes they call social housing or massive housing estates we cant sort out the housing problem some way or other.
We all need somewhere to live and instead of coming up with a way that is right, fair and acceptable, after all as David Cameron said "we are all in this together". Instead we leave it to the market and banks, just ignoring why 90% of the land is owned by 10% of the people and how the  banks got rich.

If the struggle to own a home was eased, if people could own decent homes within a reasonable time, not build massive housing estates but repopulate the countryside, use corners of fields, underground, low impact, blah, blah. I know some people will say there isn't room but I would ague there is while 90% of the land is owned by 10%, besides we all have to live somewhere and crowding people in large housing estates because of they are at the wrong end of a conquest that took place 945 years ago is just not right.

This problem causes divides and allows people to be controled and has devastating ramifications that make all efforts to solve society's problems fail. We could have an interest free bank for first time home buyers, even a one time subsidy. The point is if buying a home wasn't the struggle it was and a decent home acquired in a reasonable time frame and there's no real reason why it should be a struggle that I can see, no reason that cant be overcome its a matter of what's fair and right.

I don't have a problem with people having more money or land than me, I just think we all need a home and at least the land for it, this needs to be a right, a free right or a way to get it subject to a fair ruling.

If the countryside was repopulated especially with low impact housing it would have a major impact in all of society's problems and complaints. If your payments were low or paid for or even a uinterest free Bank for first time home buyers, then your wages would be worth more and it would be spent in the economy where its needed not gush up to the top, not straight away anyway, so creating more wealth and jobs, also maybe less parents would need to have both working, allowing one to look after the children, perhaps we would get more well rounded people, people would be forced to work though fear of losing their home, there would be less stress, less drinking, less crime and money related problems, many family arguments and breakups are money related, people could afford to be green, no having to take a job and driving long commutes in fear of losing your house,

if the countryside was repopulated with low impact housing, underground hobbit style housing, the corner of fields not housing estates it would breath life in to the country, the countryside shouldn't be the haven of just the rich, it doesn't take much imagination to see there would be even more benefits. Benefits that would be ... WIDE RANGING AND WOULD BREATH LIFE AND MERRIMENT BACK INTO THIS ISLAND

NATO Hypocrisy

NATO is helping the people of Libya because they want freedom, so who is NATO attacking they cant be Libyan people or that would be a conflict of reason, they must be armed camels

We don't know the extent of the manipulation of events like this, however we can see some of it and its a safe bet its extensiv. If we are going to judge people or countries we should start here first or when we get to others we will see the UK involved in all sorts of dark deeds at various levels from the top spreading down Governments and Private Corporations are up to all sorts of criminal and immoral schemes pretty well everywhere, as are most countries to some more than others and then we have the multinationals and people like Rothschild's who are now in their own league, so called world class elites manipulating everyone.

Wars are started over power and money and to believe otherwise is naive, you have to be blind or blinded to not see that the media is being manipulated in this war more than ever, its bloody scary actually.
The reporting of this war was so stage managed, its was embarrassing tbh, the press blackout and the censorship of the 10,000 airstrikes is shameful, I am not saying they should compromise battlefield security but mostly when you hit something with an cruise missile or some large modern bombs theres no need for it to be a secret afterwards,  if our country is at war and the results and  actions are too horrible to be shown then they should most certainly be shown, no doubt. If our government hides its actions and we accept that then we are also morally  to blame for any crimes the state carries out IMO
I cant reliably comment on the carnage as its not being reported but with 10,000 or so airstrikes it must be extensive. It would seem laws and treaties and resolutions have been broken, All sorts of skullduggery behind the scenes and if Gaddafi and his regime need to face courts then so do many of the parties trying to oust him.

You cant be free if you don't know you are not free

Injustice and Inequality;

We accept injustice and inequality, we have been deluged with hypocrisy, double talk and double think over the centuries, we are off footed and divided at ever turn, much of our education is about control and knowing your place, doing what you are told. We put up with wrongs all the time and we put up with them happening to other people and as long as we keep our heads down we are free, free to go shopping. 

You cant be free if you don't know you are not free

If you are part of a country then your freedom is tied into the social system and rules of conduct. However our freedom is conditional on us not exercising it, No Land Rights,
no right to gather without license,
no freedom of speech,
Freedom should only be conditional that we don't harm or impinge on others freedoms and inalienable rights. 

Subjected inequality;As much as some people like the Queen who is the figurehead of a titled hereditary class system we cannot be equal under this system.
We are subjects and cannot be free we are tied and powerless, we are subjected inequality. The privileged few are prospering from  past crimes even if it is not their fault, while most people don't think it is wrong or that they are dispossessed and a Lower Class, is to me crazy, the privileged few are still enjoying the fruits of conquest 947 years, that's really maddening. 

Injustice and Inequality;
We accept injustice and inequality, we have been deluged with hypocrisy, double talk and double think over the centuries, we are off footed and divided at ever turn, much of our education is about control and knowing your place, doing what you are told. We put up with wrongs all the time and we put up with them happening to other people and as long as we keep our heads down we are free, free to go shopping. 

Under occupation by enemy forces;
To be free to have freedom of choice everybody needs to have land rights, if you are to be a free citizen subject to equal rules it is essential, we all need somewhere to live. If I or if we don't have the right to live where we want that isn't on somebody else's doorstep without payment then we are not free and if something fair is not worked out by consensus then clearly this is not our country and the only conclusion is it is still under occupation by enemy forces and our Government is a sham.

Voting; After centuries of Parliament by our Lords anda hundred years of the common person having the vote, there is little change, the Labour Government of the late 40's made some inroads, it wasn't enough but it was the best they could achieve under the system that is stacked against us, at best its a pressure valve people can vote in another highly paid lying scapegoat. After all those elections we have less rights, eroded rights and more restrictive Laws or acts of parliament to be correct.
Inalienable right restored
I want my inalienable right restored to live on a part of this country I choose that's not on somebody else's doorstep without duty or payment. And I want the support of the Police if I am not allowed to use force or to defend my claim with force. If I cannot have this then I am not free. You cannot have this either so you are not free. Is NATO going to support us if we stand up and try and take back what is ours, is Cameron going to move, is the Duke of Bedford going to give up his estates in Bedfordshire, London, Somerset and Devonshire, so we can be free to live on our land, he may want it all I only need a bit, no they would hunt us down like dogs.

You cant be free if you don't know you are not free.

The Great Unwashed

The Great Unwashed

Joining the European super state should be not only a good thing but a obvious progression for the world to unite but the problem is the rich are too busy feathering their own nests, as are the politicians and they are all being manipulated or bought and in their greed they care little for their oaths or positions or what they might owe to the past and sacrifices many ordinary people of this countries population have made since the kingdom of England was formed. suffering has been a way of life, hard toil for little reward.

The Peasants Revolt of 1382 any justice or standing up for themselves has often been at the end of a bludgeon or point of the sword, or hanging if your lucky. Nonetheless many of them had backbone and or nothing to lose.

1066 Battle of Hastings.

The titled, rich and the powerful who are living off of past injustices, profiting from gross inequality and the forgotten agenda of a country that was conquered, a nations dispossession and enslavement mostly forgotten, but those that suffer this injustice the poor are thought to be culturally inept and in some way to blame for their situation. Its their fault their ancestors were on the wrong side of an invasion.
However if the conquest of 1066 was just a thing of the Past, we wouldn't have to put up with much of the Legacy such as under their rule still and while others prosper from it. We must deserve to suffer the problems of being on the losing side while these people in positions of control are doing very well out it still. Large housing estates are the consequences of a long ago conquest, even if the Great unwashed have forgotten why they don’t have inalienable Land rights.

 The great unwashed are second class, it isn't because they don't try hard enough or they are not clever enough, they are victims. Its about time that the sacrifices of the great unwashed throughout history were appreciated and measures taken to rectify this disgraceful state we find ourselves in, two class's one Upper and the other Lower.

People like the Queen and her titled gang members and Cameron and his titled and untitled feral friends are selling us down the river for the big buck, they are starting wars for the big buck, we have no choice, we go to war. If we could choose not to go into Europe we would be ruled by the very same people that would sell us down the river for a buck. What choice is that.
Something needs to change and its not going to be for the better with the system we have at the moment. We have been able to vote for nearly nine decades, women a bit less and we still have a housing problem, that says to me and very loudly, we don’t have the mother of Parliaments we have the evil step mother of Parliaments.