House of Commons , No this the house of Charlatans |
Democracy; is this really a democracy, where is the representation when many ministers are either public schoolboys and millionaires, those that are not of this class are soon bought or nobbled, then these scum vote in a leader and more or less half of these so called representatives are then fairly powerless in the party system. but because the Ol'boy network runs every area of government, the foreign office, the home office, the monetary system, the military, the police, the whole civil service and armed forces are all at the top public school boys and members of secret societies.
In the this Burlington club photo taken in 1992, there are eight famous faces:
(1) George Osborne, now the Chancellor of the Exchequer and Second Lord of the Treasury of the United Kingdom,
(2) writer Harry Mount, the heir to the Baronetcy of Wasing and Mr. Cameron’s cousin;
(3) Chris Coleridge, the descendant of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, the son of Lloyds’ chairman David Coleridge, the brother of Conde Nast managing director Nicholas Coleridge(4) German aristocrat and managing consultant Baron Lupus von Maltzahn,(5) the late Mark Petre, the heir to the Barony of Petre;(6) Australian millionaire Peter Holmes a Cour;(7) Nat Rothschild, the heir to the Barons Rothschilds and co-founder of a racy student paper with Harry Mount(8) Jason Gissing, the chairman of Ocado supermarkets.Two figures on left of (6) and (7) were blacked out before the photo was released, causing wild allegations. Their identities are yet unknown. My top contenders (based on the influence in the City, the Athenaeum and their Oxford prominence) include:
source for the above two photos and information, iconicphotos.wordpress.com.the-bullingdon-club |
The System that Rules.
The Queen is not only a State Figurehead She is also the Head of a Hereditary system of Lords a undeniable upper class system. and I think believing it is just show is making a grave mistake.The way this Gang works is the same as any other and the Leader who in this case the Queen but this also applies to all leaders; "No Leader is all Powerful, they are only as powerful as the powerful people who align and support them"Magna Carta and Our so called Civil War" should attest to that.
The Queens Powers apart from influence that comes with wealth and celebraty and her wealth and influence as I will show is Great, She is the only person to declare war and peace (official website for the British Monarchy) sounds pretty powerful to me. you might say that's just part of her head of state duties, shes being told, but who is telling her, not the PM he might have a view but War is the Buiseness of England, England the UK and the Empire built on it, Our Wealth comes from wars, Wars are the Oldest big Business and the business of Kings Its a popular view that the Queen and Lords have no power now, a view I do not subscribe too. Does anyone think the prime minister and his ministers really get to decide if we go to War if all the lords, Bankers, Arms Dealers and wealthy people beyond compare, the royal family, didn't want War, all these people back the Queen and she can say no, she is commander in chief, the archdukes virtually have private armies at their call they certainly don't answer to the PM and by Law not in the Matters of War, the Lords are in control of the armies of well trained troops ready to lay down their lives for their General and Queen and they don't go "yes sir ok PM", if they didn't want too, and truth be told some upper class gun runner and chums probably on both sides maneuvered the situation into crises and War.
The Queens Powers Outlined below you can find on the official website for the British Monarchy.
The Queen, Head of the Family, Head Family of the Oldest Gang Network in the UK, conquest and war, enslavement extortion and tax invasion, murder and mayhem incorporated. |
“The Queen is the ceremonial head of state” this is true, She is also the figurehead for a system of Lords and where her main power lies.“
Powers of the Queen
The monarch can summon, prorogation and or dissolution of Parliament; she may not have used it but this is a phenomenal power, there is also the Royal assent to bills, she can withhold it;The appointment and regulation of the civil service. This another very powerful position;
The commissioning of officers in the armed forces, very powerful position,
The monarch is the commander in chief, and dukes are major
generals, most all officers except some low ones are filled with members
of her class, this is very powerful and as long as we or parliament go
along with the rulers there is no need to exercise it, push come to
shove who are the Military officers whose friends and family are making
the rules running the Government and the Corporations going to follow,
some lefty Government or the Queen, people will willing die for her.
after the so called civil war, which was a power struggle, between aristos, the rule became spread out from the Monarchs Court, giving more power to Parliament who were Aristocracy titled or not, there was no voting for common people, with wealth and land you could vote, you might even get a title bestowed on you if you are the right sort, after the civil war once the new order was established, according to parliamentary records, a permanent army was to be maintained to stop any further civil insurrection, and the military given back to the control of Lords and the Monarch reinstated.
I repeat; one thing I hold and that is that no leader, king, dictator in history is all powerful, they are only as powerful as the powerful people that align with them. true power is wielded from behind the throne that is what magna carta and the civil war were about but that also makes the ruler powerful this is gang law.
Directing the disposition of the armed forces in the UK; as I said she is commander in chief.
the Appointment of Queen's Counsel; another very influential position.
Issue and withdrawal of passports; her country you're a subject.
Prerogative of mercy. (Used to apply in capital punishment cases. Still used, eg to remedy errors in sentence calculation) the queen signs warrants for execution in the commonwealth, shes not one for pardoning so I here.
Granting honours; some people will do anything to get on there, more power and influence
Creation of corporations by Charter; power and influence,
The Queen gives a weekly audience to the Prime Minister at which she has a right and a duty to express her views on Government matters. If either The Queen or the Prime Minister are not available to meet, then they will speak by telephone. also the princes have to be kept abreast of all secrets, in case they have to take over for some reason, Most PMs are going to be in awe of the monarch or of her class, if she tells them to do something, if she has the backing of those that she is head off, what choice would they have, her friends who back her are heads of the secret services, the Ol’bot network is in all top jobs.
the Queen being forbidden to enter the commons. This is ceremonial, its a show, nothing more,
the Queen has a say on The making of treaties; Declaration of war; Deployment of armed forces overseas; Recognition of foreign states; Accreditation and reception of diplomats. This is much power and influence
The queen is head of state for the United Kingdom of Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Jamaica, Barbados, the Bahamas, Grenada, Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Belize, Antigua and Barbuda, and Saint Kitts and Nevis. Getting the picture yet?
She has a lot of wealth power and influence in her own right but the argument that she is a figurehead of state wouldn't be so bad if she wasn't also a figurehead for a hereditary class system that is in every position of power, that is the main problem.
It doesn't matter whether the blood lines are pure or if the aristocracy has titles as long as the class system is maintained, it can blur around the edges, that helps maintain the fallacy or denial that its not really a barrier.
Rothschild got his lordship in the 17th century for his support in banking and supplying loans for War or dastardly deeds more like, his family had been loaning kings money for wars and conquest and the other side for that matter for centuries, Plutocracy or Aristocracy there is little difference they are both rule by the elite or wealthy, same difference, you don’t need to be titled to be a member of the aristocracy.
Democracy where every four years we get a chance to
vote in MP's who time after time turn out to be less than savory, cheats liars, scroungers they took advantage with expensive's which they had been doing with the public purse for centuries, and these so called representative's vote in another temporary dictator, more often than not a chap, a chum, member of the club, the right sort and nothing much
changes except more laws to restrict us and the rich get richer.
after the so called civil war, which was a power struggle, between aristos, the rule became spread out from the Monarchs Court, giving more power to Parliament who were Aristocracy titled or not, there was no voting for common people, with wealth and land you could vote, you might even get a title bestowed on you if you are the right sort, after the civil war once the new order was established, according to parliamentary records, a permanent army was to be maintained to stop any further civil insurrection, and the military given back to the control of Lords and the Monarch reinstated.
I repeat; one thing I hold and that is that no leader, king, dictator in history is all powerful, they are only as powerful as the powerful people that align with them. true power is wielded from behind the throne that is what magna carta and the civil war were about but that also makes the ruler powerful this is gang law.
Directing the disposition of the armed forces in the UK; as I said she is commander in chief.
the Appointment of Queen's Counsel; another very influential position.
Issue and withdrawal of passports; her country you're a subject.
Prerogative of mercy. (Used to apply in capital punishment cases. Still used, eg to remedy errors in sentence calculation) the queen signs warrants for execution in the commonwealth, shes not one for pardoning so I here.
Granting honours; some people will do anything to get on there, more power and influence
Creation of corporations by Charter; power and influence,
The Queen gives a weekly audience to the Prime Minister at which she has a right and a duty to express her views on Government matters. If either The Queen or the Prime Minister are not available to meet, then they will speak by telephone. also the princes have to be kept abreast of all secrets, in case they have to take over for some reason, Most PMs are going to be in awe of the monarch or of her class, if she tells them to do something, if she has the backing of those that she is head off, what choice would they have, her friends who back her are heads of the secret services, the Ol’bot network is in all top jobs.
the Queen being forbidden to enter the commons. This is ceremonial, its a show, nothing more,
the Queen has a say on The making of treaties; Declaration of war; Deployment of armed forces overseas; Recognition of foreign states; Accreditation and reception of diplomats. This is much power and influence
The queen is head of state for the United Kingdom of Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Jamaica, Barbados, the Bahamas, Grenada, Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Belize, Antigua and Barbuda, and Saint Kitts and Nevis. Getting the picture yet?
She has a lot of wealth power and influence in her own right but the argument that she is a figurehead of state wouldn't be so bad if she wasn't also a figurehead for a hereditary class system that is in every position of power, that is the main problem.
It doesn't matter whether the blood lines are pure or if the aristocracy has titles as long as the class system is maintained, it can blur around the edges, that helps maintain the fallacy or denial that its not really a barrier.
Rothschild got his lordship in the 17th century for his support in banking and supplying loans for War or dastardly deeds more like, his family had been loaning kings money for wars and conquest and the other side for that matter for centuries, Plutocracy or Aristocracy there is little difference they are both rule by the elite or wealthy, same difference, you don’t need to be titled to be a member of the aristocracy.
No comments:
Post a Comment