Shame on the UK

Our Heritage of Shame 

Head of the Gang

The Royal Family, a Heritage of Shame, its hereditary class system steeped in war, Its business War, slavery, extortion, it stands for inequality, it stand for justice but how can there be inequality and justice. Its legacy on this nation is dispossession and its heritage is slavery and war. And its Shameful that we put up with it, let alone embrace it as many of the population do, including all the Military.

In the year 2012 the UK celebrated The Queen’s Diamond Jubilee, SHAMEFUL and SHAME on the UK to rejoice in this despots gang leaders rule, are we mad stupid or is it right to Follow Gang Rule.

She stands for a system of High Gang Lords. Lords of the Land,  Kings,Queens, princes, Dukes, Earls, and Barons, the Landed Gentry, Lords who are also Bankers, heads and backers of big corporations, All top jobs in the Civil Service, Home Office, Secret Services, the Military. Old Boy's from Public Schools  who between them run this country, which is making democracy a sham. Of course there are other rich people not really in the club and lords who have fallen, who can be used to blur the perception.

SHAME, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME, SHAME on us ALL.  

notice from this hand bill of 1792 the french have equality nestsaled between Murder and Madness

with this class system  we cannot have Equality it goes against all a Lord is.

Democracy

Democracy

House of  Commons , No this the house of Charlatans 

Democracy; is this really a democracy, where is the representation when many ministers are either public schoolboys and millionaires, those that are not of this class are soon bought or nobbled, then these scum vote in a leader and more or less half of these so called representatives are then fairly powerless in the party system. but because the Ol'boy network runs every area of government, the foreign office, the home office, the monetary system, the military, the police, the whole civil service and armed forces are all at the top public school boys and members of secret societies. 

Above,Burlington Club photo

(1) the Hon. Edward Sebastian Grigg, the heir to Baron Altrincham of Tormarton and current chairman of Credit Suisse (UK)

(2) David Cameron

(3) Ralph Perry Robinson, a former child actor, designer, furniture-maker

(4) Ewen Fergusson, son of the British ambassador to France, Sir Ewen Fergusson and now at City law firm Herbert Smith

(5) Matthew Benson, the heir to the Earldom of Wemyss and March

(6) Sebastian James, the son of Lord Northbourne, a major landowner in Kent

(7) Jonathan Ford, the-then president of the club, a banker with Morgan Grenfell

(8) Boris Johnson, the-then president of the Oxford Union, now Lord Mayor of London

(9) Harry Eastwood, the investment fund consultant

In the this Burlington club photo taken in 1992, there are eight famous faces:

(1) George Osborne, now the Chancellor of the Exchequer and Second Lord of the Treasury of the United Kingdom,

(2) writer Harry Mount, the heir to the Baronetcy of Wasing and Mr. Cameron’s cousin;

(3) Chris Coleridge, the descendant of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, the son of Lloyds’ chairman David Coleridge, the brother of Conde Nast managing director Nicholas Coleridge(4) German aristocrat and managing consultant Baron Lupus von Maltzahn,(5) the late Mark Petre, the heir to the Barony of Petre;(6) Australian millionaire Peter Holmes a Cour;(7) Nat Rothschild, the heir to the Barons Rothschilds and co-founder of a racy student paper with Harry Mount(8) Jason Gissing, the chairman of Ocado supermarkets.Two figures on left of (6) and (7) were blacked out before the photo was released, causing wild allegations. Their identities are yet unknown. My top contenders (based on the influence in the City, the Athenaeum and their Oxford prominence) include: 

source for the above two photos and information, iconicphotos.wordpress.com.the-bullingdon-club

The System that Rules.

The Queen is not only a State Figurehead She is also the Head of a Hereditary system of Lords a undeniable upper class system. and I think believing it is just show is making a grave mistake.
The way this Gang works is the same as any other and the  Leader who in this case the Queen but this also applies to all leaders; "No Leader is all Powerful, they are only as powerful as the powerful people who align and support them"Magna Carta and Our so called Civil War" should attest to that.
The Queens Powers apart from influence that comes with wealth and celebraty and her wealth and influence as I will show is Great, She is the only person to declare war and peace (official website for the British Monarchy) sounds pretty powerful to me. you might say that's just part of her head of state duties, shes being told, but who is telling her, not  the PM he might have a view but War is the Buiseness of England, England the UK and the Empire built on it, Our Wealth comes from wars, Wars are the Oldest big Business and the business of Kings Its a popular view that the Queen and Lords have no power now,  a view I do not subscribe too. Does anyone think the prime minister and his ministers really get to decide if we go to War if all the lords, Bankers, Arms Dealers and wealthy people beyond compare, the royal family, didn't want War, all these people back the Queen and she can say no, she is commander in chief, the archdukes virtually have private armies at their call they certainly don't answer to the PM and by Law not in the Matters of War, the Lords are in control of the armies of well trained troops ready to lay down their lives for their General and Queen and they don't go "yes sir ok PM", if they didn't want too, and truth be told some upper class gun runner and chums probably on both sides maneuvered the situation into crises and War. 

The Queens Powers Outlined below you can find on the official website for the British Monarchy. 

The Queen, Head of the Family, Head Family of the Oldest Gang Network in the UK, conquest and war, enslavement extortion and tax invasion, murder and mayhem incorporated. 

“The Queen is the ceremonial head of state” this is true, She is also the figurehead for a system of Lords and where her main power lies.“

Powers of the Queen

The monarch can summon, prorogation and or dissolution of Parliament; she may not have used it but this is a phenomenal power, there is also the Royal assent to bills, she can withhold it;

The appointment and regulation of the civil service. This another very powerful position;

The commissioning of officers in the armed forces, very powerful position, 

The monarch is the commander in chief, and dukes are major generals, most all officers except some low ones are filled with members of her class, this is very powerful and as long as we or parliament go along with the rulers there is no need to exercise it, push come to shove who are the Military officers whose friends and family are making the rules running the Government and the Corporations going to follow, some lefty Government or the Queen, people will willing die for her.

after the so called civil war, which was a power struggle, between aristos, the rule became spread out from the Monarchs Court, giving more power to Parliament who were Aristocracy titled or not, there was no voting for common people, with wealth and land you could vote, you might even get a title bestowed on you if you are the right sort, after the civil war once the new order was established, according to parliamentary records, a permanent army was to be maintained to stop any further civil insurrection, and the military given back to the control of Lords and the Monarch reinstated.

I repeat; one thing I hold and that is that no leader, king, dictator in history is all powerful, they are only as powerful as the powerful people that align with them. true power is wielded from behind the throne that is what magna carta and the civil war were about but that also makes the ruler powerful this is gang law.

Directing the disposition of the armed forces in the UK; as I said she is commander in chief.

the Appointment of Queen's Counsel; another very influential position.

Issue and withdrawal of passports; her country you're a subject.

Prerogative of mercy. (Used to apply in capital punishment cases. Still used, eg to remedy errors in sentence calculation) the queen signs warrants for execution in the commonwealth, shes not one for pardoning so I here.

Granting honours; some people will do anything to get on there, more power and influence

Creation of corporations by Charter; power and influence,

The Queen gives a weekly audience to the Prime Minister at which she has a right and a duty to express her views on Government matters. If either The Queen or the Prime Minister are not available to meet, then they will speak by telephone. also the princes have to be kept abreast of all secrets, in case they have to take over for some reason, Most PMs are going to be in awe of the monarch or of her class, if she tells them to do something, if she has the backing of those that she is head off, what choice would they have, her friends who back her are heads of the secret services, the Ol’bot network is in all top jobs.

the Queen being forbidden to enter the commons. This is ceremonial, its a show, nothing more,

the Queen has a say on  The making of treaties; Declaration of war; Deployment of armed forces overseas; Recognition of foreign states; Accreditation and reception of diplomats. This is much power and influence

The queen is head of state for the United Kingdom of Great Britain, Northern Ireland, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Jamaica, Barbados, the Bahamas, Grenada, Papua New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Tuvalu, Saint Lucia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Belize, Antigua and Barbuda, and Saint Kitts and Nevis. Getting the picture yet?

She has a lot of wealth power and influence in her own right but the argument that she is a figurehead of state wouldn't be so bad if she wasn't also a figurehead for a hereditary class system that is in every position of power, that is the main problem.

It doesn't matter whether the blood lines are pure or if the aristocracy has titles as long as the class system is maintained, it can blur around the edges, that helps maintain the fallacy or denial that its not really a barrier.

Rothschild got his lordship in the 17th century for his support in banking and supplying loans for War or dastardly deeds more like, his family had been loaning kings money for wars and conquest and the other side for that matter for centuries, Plutocracy or Aristocracy there is little difference they are both rule by the elite or wealthy, same difference, you don’t need to be titled to be a member of the aristocracy.

Democracy;

democracy if it is such a good thing why do we have a leader and not a chairperson, instead we have a unelected Leader not elected by the people and why do the people want a Prime Minister to be a strong leader, if democracy is such a good thing surely a chairman presiding over the elected would be better. What we have is an exercise in denial and double thinking.

Democracy;

Democracy where every four years we get a chance to vote in MP's who time after time turn out to be less than savory, cheats liars, scroungers  they took advantage with expensive's which they had been doing with the public purse for centuries, and these so called representative's vote in another temporary dictator, more often than not a chap, a chum, member of the club, the right sort and nothing much changes except more laws to restrict us and the rich get richer.

For  the Rich to get richer there must be an abundance of poor and denial

And never does the housing problem get sorted, the housing problem is a legacy left over from the 1066 conquest and it is left to those that are and have benefited from this past injustice and it is never on the agenda except to keep us dispossessed unless we have capital and a lot of it, in fact we are so dumbed down we don't as a nation think it is wrong, I really cant understand this even with all the programming, division and conditioning  and to compound it people have to get massive loans from banks who are some of the most unscrupulous businesses's  and whose business over the centuries made their money from enslaving this and other nations and bankrolling wars.


How can you have a democracy when most of our country(the land) is owned by the aristocracy, democracy can not with any justice co-exist with a class system whose  legacy and Heritage is the 1066 invasion, who voted them in, no one they are there by force.